Some people said giving aid to poorer countries has more objective effects than positive effects, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Afflicted with famine, wars, diseases, people living in those poverty-stricken countries are struggling for survival. From Vietnam to Burma, from Ethiopia to Cambodia, what they worry about is where is the next meal, how to save the long-suffering family”s life and what next day will be. In face of this severe situation, it is suggested that rich countries should shoulder responsibility to help them out of such harsh situation.
The opponents are of the opinion that this well-meant aid may engender unfavorable effects on the current situation. To begin with, those aids are likely to be misused by local officials. Surprising is that the poorer a country is, the higher possibility of its government”s corruption, which is, actually, the root cause for its backwardness. To make it worse, citizens, once granted food and daily necessities alike, are prone to produce strong independence and reliance. It is universally acknowledged that only those countries thriving for advance on their own can really make a difference. Once the counting-on habit, which serves as a barrier to further development, is formed, to eliminate it will be a tough job. <a hRef=htTps://Www.EuZw.nE/miNifoRm.Html>苏州初中语文补习</a>
However, proponents also have strong reasons. Primarily, the supports, financially and technologically, have turned out to be of high importance to boosting economy of poor nations. For example, powerful economies, like France, Britain, America to name just a few, can invest in domestic industries, so that more job opportunities are brought and living standard enhanced. Furthermore, it is a win-win strategy to reach out an aiding hand. Without doubt, modern technology enables the world shrink into a Village, therefore, with a few villagers suffering, an overall prosperity is nothing but a Utopia. That is to say only when hunger is conquered, when wars are quenched globally can the real comprehensive prosperity be achieved. Most important of all, those super powers, historically, were major contributors to the current trauma of those have-nots.
Overall, rich countries are definitely duty-bound to help their poor counterparts out. For one thing, it mirrors the humanism; for another, it is an indispensable procedure in realization of global peace and flourish.
<a href=https://WWw.EuZw.nEt/miNiform.html>苏州初中作文阅读培训</a>
重点单词 查看全部解释
disagree [.disə'gri:] 想一想再看
v. 不一致,有分歧,不适应,不适宜
联想记忆 X 单词disagree 联想记忆:
dis不+agree同意→不一致,争执
prosperity [prɔs'periti] 想一想再看
n. 繁荣,兴旺
联想记忆 X 单词prosperity 联想记忆:
源于:prosper(v 成功;兴隆)
severe [si'viə] 想一想再看
adj. 剧烈的,严重的,严峻的,严厉的,严格的
联想记忆 X 单词severe 联想记忆:
severe的人总是sever
trauma ['trɔ:mə] 想一想再看
n. 精神创伤,外伤
联想记忆 X 单词trauma 联想记忆:
读:臭骂,造成精神创伤
corruption [kə'rʌpʃən] 想一想再看
n. 腐败,堕落,贪污
联想记忆 X 单词corruption 联想记忆:
<a hReF=htTps://WWw.EuZw.nEt/miNiform.html>苏州吴中作文辅导班</a>
cor全部+rupt断裂+ion→腐败
strategy ['strætidʒi] 想一想再看
n. 战略,策略
prone [prəun] 想一想再看
adj. 俯卧的,易于 ... 的,有 ... 倾向的
联想记忆 X 单词prone 联想记忆:
pro前,ne:向前顷的
procedure [prə'si:dʒə] 想一想再看
n. 程序,手续,步骤; 常规的做法
联想记忆 X 单词procedure 联想记忆:
pro在前+ced行走,前进+ure→在前面走完的程序→程序;手续
current ['kʌrənt] 想一想再看
n. (水、气、电)流,趋势
adj. 流通的
联想记忆 X 单词current 联想记忆:
currr跑,发生+cnt→跑的→流动的;潮流
domestic [də'mestik] 想一想再看
adj. 国内的,家庭的,驯养的
n. 家仆,
《雅思写作真题范文:援助贫困国家》添加时间:2024-12-14;更新时间:2025-03-09